Remote Care Enablement for Independent Practices
MPL Health helps independent practices launch and scale in-house RPM, CCM, APCM, and related care-management programs without surrendering their patients, operations, or revenue to an outside vendor.
THE MPL OWNERSHIP MODEL
Your practice owns the program.
PATIENTS
The relationships stay with your practice.
TEAM
Your internal staff builds the capability.
TECHNOLOGY
You select the tools and retain control.
ECONOMICS
Your practice keeps the long-term value.
We provide the strategy, systems, and support to make ownership possible.
Proven inside a real independent medical practice.
500+
active RPM patients
350+
active CCM patients
$100k+
recurring monthly remote-care revenue
Built and operated by the same team behind MPL Health using internal staff, selected technology partners, and practice-owned workflows.
Operating results from an affiliated practice. Individual results vary based on patient population, payer mix, staffing, and implementation.
A different operating model
Most remote-care vendors help you rent a program. We help you build one.
The difference is not just who does the work. It’s who owns the capability, the patient relationship, and the long-term economics.
Conventional outsourced-vendor model
You rent a layer of care delivery.
The vendor controls the staff, workflow, technology, patient relationship, and a large portion of the economics.
The MPL Health model
You build a durable operating asset.
Your practice owns the program, retains control, develops internal capabilities, and keeps the long-term enterprise value.
MPL Health enablement
The operating system behind your remote-care program.
01
Strategy and Financial Modeling
Analyze patient and payer opportunity, model reimbursement, select programs, and assess staffing readiness.
02
Technology and Vendor Selection
Evaluate software, devices, and service partners; guide pricing and contracts; design a technology stack that fits your operating model.
03
Workflow and Team Implementation
Define staffing roles, patient identification and enrollment, documentation, clinical escalation, and billing coordination.
04
Ongoing Optimization and Support
Build KPI dashboards and operating reviews; monitor enrollment, engagement, and billing performance; improve workflows and accountability.
Program architecture
One operational foundation. Multiple care-management opportunities.
Program selection depends on your practice, patient population, payer mix, and staffing model—not a prepackaged vendor menu.
Implementation process
From opportunity to operating program.
01
Assess
Opportunity, economics, team capacity, and readiness.
02
Design
Build the workflow, technology, roles, and reporting cadence.
03
Launch
Enroll the right patients, activate the team, coordinate billing.
04
Scale
Improve performance with disciplined operating reviews.
The MPL perspective
Advice from operators, not spectators.
MPL Health was not developed in a boardroom. It was built through the day-to-day operation of a large independent specialty practice and a remote-care program serving hundreds of patients.
Practice-tested workflows
Real staffing and enrollment experience
Ongoing operational and financial accountability
Randy Young, Founder & CEO
Built by Independent-Practice Operators
Our guidance is grounded in firsthand experience building the staffing, enrollment, documentation, clinical escalation, technology, billing, and performance-management systems required to operate remote care internally.
500+ RPM patients | 350+ CCM patients | $100K+ monthly remote-care revenue
Operating case study
What an owned remote-care program can become.
Challenge
Independent practices often lack the staffing, systems, and implementation support needed to build remote care internally.
Approach
Build the staffing, technology, enrollment, documentation, clinical, billing, and performance-management workflows inside the practice.
Result
An internally operated program supporting more than 500 RPM patients, 350 CCM patients, and over $100K in recurring monthly remote-care revenue.
Operating results from an affiliated independent medical practice. Individual results vary based on patient population, payer mix, staffing, execution, and reimbursement.
Who this is for
Designed for established independent practices.
Three or more clinicians
Adult chronic-care population
Meaningful Medicare or Medicare Advantage panel
Leadership committed to building an internal program
Preference for long-term ownership instead of outsourcing
Practical resources
A clearer way to evaluate remote-care ownership.
Explore concise guidance on program economics, staffing models, and the operational questions independent practices should ask before choosing a path.
Stop renting your remote-care program.
Build an asset your practice controls.
Evaluate your opportunity, operating model, staffing needs, and next steps.